Active Learning Strategies for Teaching about Religion

 

Active Learning
home page

Religions index

Cognitive Skills index

Learning Styles index

Intelligences index

Mystery Boxes
 

Religion: general

Purpose: to explore the mysterious nature of Ultimate Reality or the sacred

Cognitive Skills: comprehension, analysis, synthesis

Learning Styles: active, sensing, global

Intelligences: bodily/kinesthetic, interpersonal, logical-mathematical

Use: in class

For: small groups

Estimated time: 5 - 10  minutes

Materials needed: mystery boxes prepared by instructor prior to class

 

Preparation: at least half a dozen boxes should be prepared ahead of time (once prepared the same boxes can be used over and over again until they wear out):

  • Materials: 

  • a collection of small boxes (3 - 6 inches along sides should suffice). Boxes should be fairly firm so they cannot be squashed.

  • a collection of small, odd items to place into boxes (generally one item per box, although may opt to place more than one item in a given box).

  • a box with multiple items would represent a polytheistic system

  • a box with nothing in it (or something light that does not move much - like a tissue or wad or cotton) would represent the atheistic perspective).

  • dark paint or wide, opaque colored tape (e.g., duck tape) to seal and cover boxes.

  • Ideally, the teacher should get someone else to help place small objects into the boxes so that the teacher does not know what is in the boxes.

  • Seal and paint or wrap the boxes so they cannot be opened.

The Activity:

  • Briefly introduce concept of Ultimate Reality.

  • Divide students into groups of 3 - 5

  • Distribute one mystery box to each group (6 boxes should be enough for a class of 25 - 30 students).

  • Direct students to take several minutes within their group to examine the boxes in any way other than squashing them or tearing them open. "What can you tell us about what is in the box?" (wording it this way is important; do not simply ask them to try to determine "what is in the box" because you will not get quite the diversity of response that you are looking for.)

  • After about five minutes or so, refocus student attention and have each group share their observations about what is in their box. There are two kinds of responses they will give: characteristics and actual names of specific objects

  • List the responses in two columns on the board: 

  • characteristics (e.g., soft, heavy, round, flat sides, etc.)

  • names of specific items that they conclude may be in the box (e.g., an eraser, a marker, a button, a rock, a cotton ball, etc.). If the group does not offer a specific item as their conclusion, ask if they have have ideas what it might be (they may not have one).

  • Ask students to analyze the two lists and identify how they differ (one is "characteristics," the other is "names").

Lecture follow-up: use this exercise as an opportunity to launch into a mini-lecture on the difference between the name "God" and the characteristics of "God" which might also apply to some other "higher power." Point out that the specific objects they have named might share some of the same characteristics. "It might not be what you think it is." Discuss how the sacred or Ultimate Reality is much like these mystery boxes. "There is just so much we can know about it through empirical (physical, sensory) evidence."

Closure: Go around and collect the mystery boxes. Invariably the students will not want to give up their boxes without finding out what is in the boxes. At this point, the teacher can take several approaches:

  1. tell the students you do not know what is in the box as someone else put them together (it is a "double blind" exercise).

  2. tell the students what is in the boxes.

  3. tell the students what you believe is in the boxes (since you did not put them together you do not really know what's in them).

  4. lie to the students: tell them what is in the boxes with an air of authority as if you do know what's in them.

  5. pretend to be unsure until you manipulate the box a bit yourself and then appear to "remember" what is in the box.

The teacher can mix and match the above approaches since there are several boxes. Even if the teacher actually does know what is in the boxes, she can lie and sound sincere or tell the truth.

  • If you have not told the students what is in the box, ask them how that makes them feel? (frustrated?). The point of this is that we really do not know what Ultimate Reality is, but we can have all sorts of clues about it's nature.

  • If you have told the students what is in the box, ask them if they believe what you've told them (likely they will say "yes"). Ask them why they believe you. They may say:

  • because you, as the teacher, are the "authority." You can point out this is just like the priest or minister or Sunday school teacher or parent - we assume people in authority have more knowledge then we do.

  • because "you put the boxes together" (you never told them you put the boxes together). Again, use this as an opportunity to demonstrate how we make assumptions and don't question the "knowledge" we have (or are told) about mysterious things like the sacred.

 

Alternative possibilities: Any discipline, e.g., science, where careful observation and analysis skills are needed without jumping to conclusions. What else might be a mystery in a given discipline? Events of ancient history? The origins of the universe discussed in a science class? Determining if there is life on other planets or even planets around other stars? 


Acknowledgment for this idea must go to the Unitarian Universalist Church religious education program.

Created by: Laura Ellen Shulman

top of page

Page updated: May 26, 2004