Deep Thinking Skills |
What follows is a list of the kinds of "deep thinking" you can do with examples of questions to consider that encourage and reflect these different kinds of thinking skills. You might consider formulating and addressing some of these questions in the context of your journaling or class discussions. Don't just pick any question at random. Select those that make sense within the context of the material you are considering. Those questions noted below are just suggestions. You are encouraged to modify them or even compose your own that would fit within any of the categories listed. When writing questions for reflection, use the following guidelines:
Metacognition (thinking about your own thinking processes):
Comprehension (Understanding): to convert information into a form that is personally meaningful, i.e., that makes sense to the individual who is learning it.
Application: to apply abstract or theoretical principles to concrete, practical situations.
Analysis: to break down or dissect information into its component parts in order to detect the relationship among the parts, or the relationship between the parts and the whole. (For example, identifying the underlying causes or sources of disagreement during a class discussion.)
Synthesis: to build up or connect separate pieces of information to form a larger, more coherent pattern. (Examples: Connecting related ideas discussed in separate sections or units of a course into a single, unified product, such as a concept map. Integrating ethical concepts learned in a course and philosophy with marketing concepts learned in a business course to produce a set of ethical guidelines for business marketing and advertising practices.)
Evaluation: to critically judge the validity (truth), morality (ethics), or aesthetic (artistic) value of ideas, data, or products by using relevant assessment criteria (standards for judging quality).
Deduction: to draw conclusions about particular instances that are logically consistent with, or derive from general principles and premises.
Induction: to infer (derive or draw out) well-reasoned generalizations or principles from individual instances or specific examples. (For example, identifying recurrent themes or categories that emerge during a class discussion.)
Adduction: to make a case for an argument or position by accumulating supporting evidence in the form of logical arguments (rational thinking) or research evidence (empirical reasoning).
Refutation: to make a case against an argument or position by accumulating contradictory evidence in the form of logical arguments (rational thinking) or research findings (empirical reasoning).
Balanced Thinking: to carefully consider arguments/evidence for and against a particular position or viewpoint.
Multiple Perspective-Taking: to view an issue from a variety of viewpoints, standpoints, or positions in order to gain a more comprehensive and holistic understanding.
Causal Reasoning: to identify cause-effect relationships between different ideas or actions.
Ethical Reasoning: to identify what is morally right/ wrong or good/bad about particular ideas, attitudes, or practices.
Creative Thinking: to generate imaginative ideas, unique perspectives, innovative strategies, or novel (alternative) approaches to traditional practices.
Resource: Joe Cuseo, Faculty, Psychology & Director, Freshman Seminar, Marymount College |
Created by Laura Ellen Shulman |
Last updated: July 16, 2006
|