Course Home

Syllabus & Assignments

Resources

Eastern Religions

Primary Source Texts
Read & Discussion
(online)

The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you with some of the more popular and important texts that inform some of the religions of Asia.

What is a "Primary Source Text"?
A "primary source text" is authored by and/or used by people within the religion. As an example, the Bible is the primary source text for Christianity. Your textbook for this course is an example of a secondary text - it is not used by these religions but, rather, tells about them from an "outsider's" perspective. Primary source texts are (and inform) an "insider's" perspective.*

In this course, you will read and discuss four primary source texts. These are all relatively short. With possible exception of the Analects of Confucius, each can actually be read in an evening (although you may want to take more time to reflect on and think about what these texts have to say).

Four primary source texts:

All of these texts are being read in translation. There are various translations available, each with its pros and cons (some easier to understand and more or less literal translation). The use of different translations can be valuable as each may shed light on the other. 

You can purchase your text in the campus bookstore, in any good bookstore in your community (e.g. Barnes&Noble), or online through Amazon (or other online book sellers). You may also be able to borrow these texts from a public or college library (they are on reserve in the Woodbridge campus library). These texts are also available at various locations on the Web. Just make sure that whatever text you use contains the "full-text" rather than select chapters (I have indicated, above, the number of chapters you should find in each text). If you are unsure of the version/edition you have selected, ask your mentor about it.

For each of four primary texts, read at specified points as you study each religion, you are to participate in discussion of specific passages. Three posts per text: your own initial post plus a response to posts from two of your classmates (12 posts total) Plus an additional concluding post and replies reflecting on the texts in general.

For each text:

Post #1:

  1. Select a passage you like:
    • Cite (chapter & verse, NOT page number) and quote the passage (may copy and paste from an online source)
    • Offer your own, original interpretation and/or application of the passage (how it might relate to your life or our own culture)
  2. Also select a passage that puzzles you:
    • Cite (chapter & verse) and quote the passage
    • Explain what about it puzzles you? (post this so that others might offer their understanding of the passage and shed some light on it for you)
  1. Go to the Primary Text forum on the discussion board in the course site; look for the thread for the text you are discussing.
  2. Before you post your interpretation, scan through the existing posts to make sure no one else has already offered an interpretation of that passage. If that passage is already under discussion, then you can use your interpretation as a reply (your post #2, noted below) and you will have to pick a different passage to post as your initial interpretation (your post #1). Duplicate passages will not count.
  3. Same with your puzzling passage - if someone else has already posted that one, then pick another to post as one that puzzles you.
  4. Post as a reply to the existing thread for the text in question (cannot add new threads to this forum)
  5. Include both passages in your single post
  6. Identify (change) the subject line by the chapter & verse of the two passages that you are discussing

Review posts from classmates:

Post #2: Reply to a classmate, offer an alternative interpretation and/or application to the passage a classmate has interpreted

  • Change the subject line to indicate the chapter & verse of the first passage your classmate has cited (the first passage they offer their understanding of that you are addressing in this post)

Post #3: Reply to a different classmate, attempt to explain the passage that puzzled them

  • Share your understanding of the passage
  • Change the subject line to indicate the chapter & verse of the second passage your classmate has cited (the puzzling one you are addressing in this third post)

Note: For each of the four texts, you should end up discussing three different passages in three different posts (including the passage you interpret in your first post) (12 posts total)

Repeat process for each text in turn:

  1. Bhagavad Gita while you are studying Hinduism
  2. Dhammapada while you are studying Buddhism
  3. Tao Te Ching while you are studying Taoism
  4. Lun Yu (Analects of Confucius) while you are studying Confucianism

Conclude discussion of these primary texts with some general observations:

  • Which text you liked most, and why
  • Which text you liked least, and why
  • Read and reply to what your classmates had to say about their most and least favorite of these texts: In what ways did their reasons for liking or disliking a particular text resonate with you or offer you a different perspective you'd not considered?

If you miss or otherwise neglect the discussions, you can demonstrate your familiarity of the text(s) for partial credit: write a personal response, addressing the following:

  • What would you say is the most important main idea or theme of this text? 

  • What was your overall impression of the text? Did you like it? Why or why not? 

  • What most impressed you about this text? What most puzzled you (cite some specific passages)? 

  • What universal and eternal truths could you see in the text (cite some specific passages)? How could you see these truths applying to your own life and/or our own culture? 

  • Did you detect any similarities between the text and some other sacred text you may be more familiar with (such as one from your own religion) (cite some specific passages)?

Grading based on:

Five threads each worth 10% of the grade for this assignment (base grade starts at 50% for even just a single post). Basically, minus one grade level for this assignment for each text (or concluding thoughts) not discussed. 

  • Three posts for each of four texts = 10% of this assignment grade per text. Your initial post for each text (introducing two passages to the discussion) is weighted twice as heavy as your replies to classmates.

  • Concluding thoughts (on the texts you liked most and least) along with replies to classmates on this, is worth another 10% for the primary text discussion.

Quality considerations: Individual discussion posts will get a quality grade based on the five star rating system in the discussion forum. five stars = A+. 1 star = D-

    • Clear familiarity with the texts (discuss the texts, not the religions in general nor about something from any introductory material associated with the texts)
    • Quality: insight, originality, depth of reflection into the passages you discuss
    • General clarity of expression
    • Proper citation of passages discussed (reference "in text" citation format: ch#:vs#)
    • Response to classmates' comments relate specifically to things your classmates had to say and offer new insights, explain disagreements or differences of opinion you may have.

Assignment grade will not be posted until the end of the course (once you have completed your discussion of all four texts and concluding thoughts on the texts or submitted your last R&R paper).


*An "outsider" is someone who is not a follower of the religion they discuss; an "insider" is someone who is a follower of the religion they discuss. In other words, we can be informed by someone outside or inside of a given religion. Either may be more or less knowledgeable, more or less biased or objective, and have any number of "agendas" for discussing what they do, that will inform the way they present the material.

Created by Laura Ellen Shulman 

home

Last updated: September 18, 2014