| 
Primary Source TextsRead & Discussion
 (online)
 The
purpose of this assignment
is to familiarize you with some of the more popular and important texts that
inform some of the religions of Asia. What is a "Primary Source Text"?A "primary
source text" is authored by and/or used by people within the religion. As
an example, the Bible is the primary source text for Christianity. Your textbook
for this course is an example of a secondary text - it is not used by these
religions but, rather, tells about them from an "outsider's"
perspective. Primary source texts are (and inform) an "insider's" 
perspective.*
 In this course, you will read
and discuss four primary source texts. These are all relatively short. With possible exception of the Analects
of Confucius, each can actually be read in an evening (although you may
want to take more time to reflect on and think about what these texts have to
say). Four primary
source texts: 
All of these texts are being read in
translation. There are various translations available, each with its pros
and cons (some easier to understand and more or less literal translation). The
use of different translations can be valuable as each may shed light on the
other.  You
can purchase your text  in the campus bookstore, in any good bookstore in your
community (e.g. Barnes&Noble), or online through Amazon (or other
online book sellers). You may also be able to borrow these texts from a public
or college library (they are on reserve in the Woodbridge campus library). These texts are also
 available
at various locations on the Web. Just make sure that whatever text you use contains the
"full-text" rather than select chapters (I have indicated, above, the
number of chapters you should find in each text). If you are unsure of the
version/edition you have selected, ask your mentor about it. For each of four primary texts,
read at specified points as you study each religion, you are to participate
in discussion of specific passages. Three posts per text: your own
initial post plus a response to posts from two of your classmates (12 posts
total) Plus an additional concluding post and replies reflecting on the texts in
general. For each text: 
  Post #1: 
    Select a passage you like:
      
        Cite (chapter & verse, NOT page
          number) and quote the passage (may copy and paste from an online
          source)Offer your own, original interpretation
          and/or application of the passage (how it might relate to your life or
          our own culture)Also select a passage that puzzles you:
      
        Cite (chapter & verse) and quote the
          passageExplain what about it puzzles you? (post
          this so that others might offer their understanding of the passage and
          shed some light on it for you) 
 
  
    
      | 
          Go to the Primary Text forum on the
            discussion board in the course site; look for the thread for the
            text you are discussing.Before you post
            your interpretation, scan through the existing posts
            to make sure no one else has already offered an interpretation of
            that passage. If that passage is already under discussion, then you
            can use your interpretation as a reply (your post #2, noted below)
            and you will have to pick a different passage to post as your
            initial interpretation (your post #1). Duplicate passages will
            not count.Same with your puzzling
            passage - if someone else has already posted that one, then
            pick another to post as one that puzzles you.Post as a reply to
            the existing thread for the text in question (cannot add
            new threads to this forum)Include both passages in your
            single postIdentify (change) the
            subject line by the chapter & verse of the two passages
            that you are discussing |  Review posts from classmates: Post #2:
  Reply to a classmate, offer an alternative interpretation and/or application
  to the passage a classmate has interpreted 
    
      Change the subject line
        to indicate the chapter & verse of the first passage your
        classmate has cited (the first passage they offer their understanding of
        that you are addressing in this post) Post #3:
  Reply to a different classmate, attempt to explain the passage that
  puzzled them 
    
      Share your understanding of the passageChange the subject line
        to indicate the chapter & verse of the second passage your
        classmate has cited (the puzzling one you are addressing in this third
        post) Note: For each of the four
texts, you should end up discussing three different passages
in three different posts (including the passage you interpret in your
first post) (12 posts total) Repeat process for each text in
turn: 
  Bhagavad Gita while you are studying
    HinduismDhammapada while you are studying
    BuddhismTao Te Ching while you are studying
    TaoismLun Yu (Analects of Confucius) while
    you are studying Confucianism Conclude discussion
of these primary texts with some general observations: 
  Which text you liked most, and whyWhich text you liked least, and whyRead
    and reply to what your classmates had to say about
    their most and least favorite of these texts: In what ways did their reasons
    for liking or disliking a particular text resonate with you or offer you a
    different perspective you'd not considered? If
you miss or otherwise neglect the discussions, you can demonstrate your
familiarity of the text(s) for partial credit: write a personal response,
addressing the following: 
  
    What would you say is the most important main idea or theme of this
    text? 
    What was your overall impression of the text? Did you like it? Why
    or why not? 
    What most impressed you about this text? What most puzzled you (cite
    some specific passages)? 
    What universal and eternal truths could you see in the text (cite
    some specific passages)? How could you see these truths applying to your own
    life and/or our own culture? Did you detect any similarities between the text
    and some other sacred text you may be more familiar with (such as one from
    your own religion) (cite some specific passages)? Grading
based on: Five
threads each worth 10% of the grade for this assignment (base
grade starts at 50% for even just a single post). Basically, minus one grade
level for this assignment for each text (or concluding thoughts) not discussed.  
  
    Three
    posts for each of four texts = 10% of this assignment grade
    per text. Your initial post for each text (introducing two passages to the
    discussion) is weighted twice as heavy as your replies to
    classmates.
    Concluding
    thoughts (on the texts you liked most and least) along with replies
    to classmates on this, is worth another 10% for the primary text discussion. Quality
considerations: Individual discussion posts will get a quality
grade based on the five star rating system in the discussion forum. five stars =
A+. 1 star = D- 
  
    Clear familiarity
      with the texts (discuss the texts, not the religions in general
      nor about something from any introductory material associated with the
      texts)Quality:
      insight, originality, depth of reflection into the passages you
      discussGeneral clarity
      of expressionProper
      citation of passages discussed (reference "in
      text" citation format: ch#:vs#)Response
      to classmates' comments relate specifically to things your
      classmates had to say and offer new insights, explain
      disagreements or differences of opinion you may have. Assignment grade will not be posted until the end
of the course (once you have completed your discussion of all four texts and
concluding thoughts on the texts or submitted your last R&R
paper). 
 
*An "outsider" is someone who is not a follower of
the religion they discuss; an "insider" is someone who is a
follower of the religion they discuss. In other words, we can be informed by
someone outside or inside of a given religion. Either may be more or less
knowledgeable, more or less biased or objective, and have any number of
"agendas" for discussing what they do, that will inform the way they
present the material.
 |